FAP 31 over BIG WAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+36.45757, -83.2388036°27'27" N, 83°14'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FAP 31 over BIG WAR CREEK |
Structure number: | 34SR0310001 |
Location: | 3.10 MI.N. JCT. FAS 2349 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 110.9 ft. [33.8 m] |
Total length: | 117.1 ft. [35.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 42.3 ft. [12.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 46.6 ft. [14.2 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1999 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,360 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 83.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 3360 | 83.3 |
June 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 2770 | 85.6 |
July 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 2560 | 86.5 |
July 2012 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 2380 | 87.3 |
July 2010 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Very Good | 2740 | 85.7 |
August 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 2820 | 85.3 |
August 2006 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 2920 | 85.9 |
August 2004 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 2850 | 86.2 |
May 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 2760 | 86.6 |
May 2000 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 2690 | 86.9 |
August 1998 | Fair | - | - | - | 2700 | 82.7 |
May 1996 | Fair | - | - | - | 2140 | 85.3 |
August 1994 | Fair | - | - | - | 2330 | 84.5 |
May 1992 | Fair | - | - | - | 2050 | 85.8 |
September 1990 | Fair | - | - | - | 2050 | 85.8 |