NFA B096 over BRANCH


+35.99528, -83.99806
35°59'43" N, 83°59'53" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NFA B096 over BRANCH
Structure number:470B0960001
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Total length:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:260 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:46.5 tons [42.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:56.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$176,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201656.7PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactorySD260
June 201456.7PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactorySD260
June 201256.7PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactorySD260
June 201055.5PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactorySD260
July 200855.5PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactorySD260
June 200652.5PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactorySD260
June 200452.5PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactorySD260
May 200268.5FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory-260
April 200067.5FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory-260
June 199867.5FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory-260
May 199667.5FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory-260
June 199477.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-260
March 199277.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-260
May 199077.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-260