Share:

NFA E176 over TEN MILE CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.94472, -84.05639
35°56'41" N, 84°03'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:NFA E176 over TEN MILE CREEK
Structure number:470E1760001
Location:CITY OF KNOXVILLE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Total length:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:98.0 tons [89.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.0

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
May 201694.0Good7 out of 10-200
May 201494.0Good7 out of 10-300
May 201294.0Good7 out of 10-300
May 201094.0Good7 out of 10-300
May 200894.0Good7 out of 10-300
May 200691.0Good7 out of 10-300
May 200491.0Good7 out of 10-300
April 200290.0Good7 out of 10-300
March 200091.0Good7 out of 10-300
June 199891.0Good7 out of 10-300
May 199691.0Good8 out of 10-300