+35.99444, -83.95250
35°59'40" N, 83°57'09" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:I275 over SECOND CREEK
Structure number:47I02750013
Location:1.8 M E OF SR33
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Total length:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1962
Year reconstructed:1980
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:59,990 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:59.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$694,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
November 201659.0Fair5 out of 10-59990
December 201459.0Fair5 out of 10-58360
December 201259.0Fair5 out of 10-58830
January 201159.0Fair5 out of 10-59750
December 200859.0Fair5 out of 10-60340
November 200659.0Fair5 out of 10-58470
November 200459.0Fair5 out of 10-60680
September 200259.0Fair5 out of 10-62920
September 200059.0Fair5 out of 10-59140
December 199859.0Fair5 out of 10-64240
September 199659.0Fair5 out of 10-54700
November 199459.0Fair5 out of 10-56670
August 199259.0Fair5 out of 10-44800
October 199056.0Fair5 out of 10-44800

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.9,3649,104200600