+35.94167, -84.05972
35°56'30" N, 84°03'35" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAU 169 over TEN MILE CREEK
Structure number:47S24040001
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Total length:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:24,200 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:98.0 tons [89.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:74.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$478,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201674.0Fair6 out of 10-24200
February 201475.0Good7 out of 10-22030
February 201274.5Good7 out of 10-22980
March 201071.3Good7 out of 10-23560
April 200871.5Good7 out of 10-23070
March 200668.7Good7 out of 10-29140
March 200469.3Good8 out of 10-27920
February 200270.0Good8 out of 10-26300
February 200087.7Good8 out of 10-24930
March 199894.0Good9 out of 10-15890
October 199594.2Good9 out of 10-15450
June 199495.1Good9 out of 10-13000
January 199258.8Fair6 out of 10FO19390
February 199058.8Fair6 out of 10FO19390