+36.01806, -83.85861
36°01'05" N, 83°51'31" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAP 1 over LOVE CREEK
Structure number:47SR0010037
Location:.4 M S OF KNOXVILLE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:82.7 ft. [25.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1927
Year reconstructed:1974
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,370 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:12% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:65.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,240,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
December 201565.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-14370
December 201365.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-13560
January 201265.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-13600
January 201065.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-12520
February 200873.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-13240
January 200676.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-15360
January 200476.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-14110
October 200176.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-12900
November 199976.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-13650
January 199871.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-26100
September 199571.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-25300
October 199371.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-17200
December 199171.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-16700
January 199071.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-16700

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.292292000
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.1,0221,0022000
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.6,1325,51961300
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.84622200
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.1681214700
Elastomeric Bearingeach1212000
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.146737300