FAP 62 over BRANCH


+35.97528, -84.00639
35°58'31" N, 84°00'23" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAP 62 over BRANCH
Structure number:47SR0620007
Location:1.8 M E OF I75
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Total length:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2014
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:26,260 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:77.5

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
January 201677.5Good7 out of 10-26260
January 201484.0Good8 out of 10-26290
January 201284.0Good7 out of 10-23320
February 201084.0Good7 out of 10-23340
March 200883.0Good7 out of 10-25940
February 200685.0Good7 out of 10-27730
February 200485.0Good7 out of 10-26400
November 200185.0Good7 out of 10-27590
December 199985.0Good7 out of 10-31420
February 199888.4Good7 out of 10-15490
September 199588.4Good7 out of 10-15490
October 199385.0Good7 out of 10-22940
January 199285.0Good7 out of 10-22940
January 199085.0Good7 out of 10-22940

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.6095337600