Share:

FAP 30 over LITTLE RICHLAND CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.49315, -85.00702
35°29'35" N, 85°00'25" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAP 30 over LITTLE RICHLAND CREEK
Structure number:72SR0300009
Location:IN DAYTON CITY LIMITS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Total length:112.9 ft. [34.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:52.2 ft. [15.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,580 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:78.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$208,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2018FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood758078.7
September 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood725078.7
September 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood684081.0
September 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood688081.0
September 2010FairSatisfactoryGoodGood706081.0
October 2008FairSatisfactoryGoodGood633081.0
August 2006FairSatisfactoryGoodGood606081.3
September 2004FairSatisfactoryGoodGood701081.0
August 2002FairSatisfactoryGoodGood664081.0
October 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodGood546082.7
October 1998FairSatisfactoryGoodGood990080.9
October 1996FairSatisfactoryGoodGood1050080.9
July 1995FairSatisfactoryGoodGood1020080.9
July 1993FairSatisfactoryGoodGood1010080.9
July 1991FairSatisfactoryGoodGood885087.3