NFA A508 over BUFFALO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+36.38802, -84.4204236°23'17" N, 84°25'14" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NFA A508 over BUFFALO CREEK |
Structure number: | 760A5000001 |
Location: | 1.2 MI SE JCT SR63 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 79.7 ft. [24.3 m] |
Total length: | 200.1 ft. [61.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2006 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 330 [as of 2019] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 330 | 99.9 |
August 2016 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 330 | 99.9 |
September 2014 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 330 | 99.9 |
September 2012 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Excellent | 330 | 99.9 |
October 2010 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 99.9 |
October 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 99.9 |
January 2007 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 94.9 |
September 2004 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Poor | 330 | 13.1 |
August 2002 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Poor | 330 | 13.1 |
August 2000 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 330 | 17.0 |
October 1998 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 330 | 17.0 |
July 1996 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 100 | 45.9 |
October 1994 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 120 | 34.8 |
July 1992 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 700 | 28.8 |
November 1990 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 700 | 48.0 |