Share:

FAP 29 over WEBB CREEK

Scott County, Tennessee

Map

Coordinates:
+36.31455, -84.62695
36°18'52" N, 84°37'37" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAP 29 over WEBB CREEK
Structure number:76SR0290001
Location:2.1 MI SW SR52
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:41.3 ft. [12.6 m]
Total length:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.8 ft. [10.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.4 ft. [11.7 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1925
Year reconstructed:1989
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,870 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:22% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:80.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$428,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
April 2017FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory187080.0
April 2015FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory186080.0
April 2013FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory195080.0
April 2011FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory214079.0
April 2009FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory212079.0
March 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory238077.0
April 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory241079.0
April 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory223079.0
April 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory225079.0
March 1999FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory224079.0
April 1997FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory223079.0
March 1995FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory202078.0
January 1993FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory190079.0
March 1991FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair189048.0

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girderlinear ft.8686000
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.215206450
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.613613000
Reinforced Concrete Top Flangesq. ft.1,02195502343
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.1,02120208190
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.785511120
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach44000
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.8696890