Share:

FAP 29 over BLACK WOLF CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+36.31677, -84.62483
36°19'00" N, 84°37'29" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAP 29 over BLACK WOLF CREEK
Structure number:76SR0290003
Location:1.9 MI SW JCT SR52
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Total length:154.5 ft. [47.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.4 ft. [11.7 m]
Skew angle:50°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1925
Year reconstructed:1989
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,870 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:22% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:52.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,337,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
April 2017FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory187052.9
April 2015FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory186052.9
April 2013FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory195052.9
April 2011FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory214051.9
April 2009FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory212068.0
March 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory238077.0
April 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory241079.0
April 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory223079.0
April 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory225079.0
March 1999FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory224079.0
April 1997FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory223079.0
March 1995FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory202078.0
December 1992FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory189079.0
March 1991PoorFairPoorFair189029.7

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girderlinear ft.30823146310
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.770617122310
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.1,5401,5301000
Reinforced Concrete Top Flangesq. ft.4,3122,0462,1561100
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.4,31243003,8820
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.114872070
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.7664390
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach1616000
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.3080277310