FAP 29 over BLACK WOLF CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+36.31677, -84.62483
36°19'00" N, 84°37'29" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	FAP 29 over BLACK WOLF CREEK
Structure number:	76SR0290003
Location:	1.9 MI SW JCT SR52
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) `[02]`
Length of largest span:	34.1 ft. `[10.4 m]`
Total length:	154.5 ft. `[47.1 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	34.5 ft. `[10.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	38.4 ft. `[11.7 m]`
Skew angle:	50°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1925
Year reconstructed:	1989
Historic significance:	Historical significance is not determinable at this time `[4]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	4
Main spans material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main spans design:	Tee beam `[04]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	1,870 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	22% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	52.9
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$1,337,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
April 2017	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	1870	52.9
April 2015	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	1860	52.9
April 2013	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	1950	52.9
April 2011	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	2140	51.9
April 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	2120	68.0
March 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2380	77.0
April 2005	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2410	79.0
April 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2230	79.0
April 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2250	79.0
March 1999	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2240	79.0
April 1997	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2230	79.0
March 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2020	78.0
December 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1890	79.0
March 1991	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	1890	29.7

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder	linear ft.	308	231	46	31	0
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	770	617	122	31	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	1,540	1,530	10	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange	sq. ft.	4,312	2,046	2,156	110	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	4,312	430	0	3,882	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	114	87	20	7	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	76	64	3	9	0
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearing	each	16	16	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	308	0	277	31	0