Share: 
FAP 29 over BUTTRAM BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+36.38208, -84.55870
36°22'55" N, 84°33'31" W
+36.38208, -84.55870
36°22'55" N, 84°33'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | FAP 29 over BUTTRAM BRANCH |
| Structure number: | 76SR0290005 |
| Location: | 9 M NE OF MORGAN CO LN |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
| Length of largest span: | 10.5 ft. [3.2 m] |
| Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1990 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,920 [as of 2017] |
| Truck traffic: | 19% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $241,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2017 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5920 | 78.0 |
| April 2015 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5220 | 78.0 |
| April 2013 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 5190 | 78.0 |
| April 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5850 | 78.0 |
| April 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5920 | 77.0 |
| March 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 6160 | 77.0 |
| April 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 6420 | 80.0 |
| April 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5890 | 80.0 |
| April 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5920 | 80.0 |
| March 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5570 | 80.0 |
| April 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4770 | 80.0 |
| March 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5110 | 80.0 |
| December 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3570 | 80.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 591 | 561 | 20 | 10 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1511322
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1511322