Share: 
FAP 63 over PAINT ROCK CR & TN RWY
Map
Coordinates:
+36.40460, -84.45122
36°24'17" N, 84°27'04" W
+36.40460, -84.45122
36°24'17" N, 84°27'04" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | FAP 63 over PAINT ROCK CR & TN RWY |
| Structure number: | 76SR0630007 |
| Location: | 1.71 MI.E.OF HUNTSVILLE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad and waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
| Length of largest span: | 105.6 ft. [32.2 m] |
| Total length: | 518.7 ft. [158.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 47.6 ft. [14.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 50.2 ft. [15.3 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1983 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 5 |
| Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main spans design: | Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,660 [as of 2017] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 67.0 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $467,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 6660 | 67.0 |
| April 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5780 | 78.0 |
| April 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5520 | 78.0 |
| April 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 6560 | 78.0 |
| April 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 6520 | 78.0 |
| April 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 6980 | 78.0 |
| April 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 6570 | 80.0 |
| May 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6100 | 80.0 |
| May 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5890 | 80.0 |
| April 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4200 | 80.0 |
| May 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3850 | 80.0 |
| March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4100 | 79.1 |
| January 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3000 | 79.1 |
| March 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3000 | 79.1 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1511340
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1511340