Share:

FAU 804 over BRANCH

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.05444, -89.88611
35°03'16" N, 89°53'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FAU 804 over BRANCH
Structure number:79008040003
Location:MENDENHALL RD S - MEMPHIS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:25,730 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:77.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$556,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
April 201577.6Fair6 out of 10-25730
April 201377.6Fair6 out of 10-25730
May 201177.6Good7 out of 10-25730
July 200977.6Good7 out of 10-25730
October 200777.6Good7 out of 10-25730
September 200577.4Good7 out of 10-27020
October 200377.1Good7 out of 10-28770
November 200176.6Good7 out of 10-31690
March 200076.7Good7 out of 10-31240
June 199876.5Good7 out of 10-32300
May 199676.8Good7 out of 10-30310