FAU 5065 over BRANCH


+35.01389, -90.00194
35°00'50" N, 90°00'07" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FAU 5065 over BRANCH
Structure number:790A9990001
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,740 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:74.8 tons [68.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.5

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
March 201796.5Fair6 out of 10-3740
April 201596.5Fair6 out of 10-3740
April 201369.2Poor4 out of 10SD3740
May 201169.2Poor4 out of 10SD3740
June 200996.5Good7 out of 10-3740
November 200796.5Good7 out of 10-3740
October 200596.5Good7 out of 10-3640
October 200396.5Good7 out of 10-3530
November 200196.4Good7 out of 10-4600
April 200096.4Good7 out of 10-4570
June 199894.3Good7 out of 10-5050
May 199894.4Good7 out of 10-4450
February 199694.3Good7 out of 10-5050
September 199396.4Good7 out of 10-4200
December 199196.9Good7 out of 10-900