Share:

FAU 5226 over CYPRESS CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.16756, -89.99069
35°10'03" N, 89°59'26" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAU 5226 over CYPRESS CREEK
Structure number:790B5050001
Location:UNIVERSITY ST - MEMPHIS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Total length:94.2 ft. [28.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:50.2 ft. [15.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:72.8 ft. [22.2 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,640 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:78.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,363,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
March 2017FairSatisfactoryFairGood264078.2
April 2015FairFairFairGood264077.2
April 2013FairFairFairGood264077.2
May 2011FairFairFairGood264077.2
June 2009FairFairFairGood264077.2
November 2007FairFairFairGood264077.2
October 2005FairFairFairGood263077.2
November 2003FairFairFairGood261077.2
November 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood322089.2
April 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodGood275089.2
June 1998FairFairFairGood355077.1
May 1998FairSatisfactoryGoodGood470089.0
January 1996FairFairFairGood355077.1
September 1993FairFairFairGood390077.1
December 1991FairFairFairGood10077.5