Share:

NFA C459 over BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+35.23778, -89.98278
35°14'16" N, 89°58'58" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NFA C459 over BRANCH
Structure number:790C4590001
Location:REDVERS AVE - MEMPHIS
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:700 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:89.4

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
May 201589.4Good7 out of 10-700
May 201389.4Good7 out of 10-700
June 201189.4Good7 out of 10-700
August 200989.4Good7 out of 10-700
November 200789.4Good7 out of 10-700
November 200589.4Good7 out of 10-700
November 200389.4Good7 out of 10-700
December 200189.4Good7 out of 10-500
April 200089.4Good7 out of 10-500
June 199889.4Good7 out of 10-500
May 199688.4Good7 out of 10-500