Share:

NFA L006 over BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+35.15850, -89.81525
35°09'31" N, 89°48'55" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NFA L006 over BRANCH
Structure number:790L0060001
Location:IN MEMPHIS
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:8.2 ft. [2.5 m]
Total length:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1980
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,260 [as of 2018]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:80.3

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
April 2017Fair6 out of 10126080.3
April 2015Good7 out of 10126080.3
February 2013Good7 out of 10126080.3
June 2011Good7 out of 10126080.3
August 2009Good7 out of 10126080.3
December 2007Good7 out of 10126080.3
October 2005Good7 out of 10126080.3
December 2003Good7 out of 10126080.3
January 2002Good7 out of 10200077.0
May 2000Good8 out of 10200077.0
June 1998Good8 out of 10200077.0