Share:

FAU 5257 over BRANCH

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.14056, -89.91611
35°08'26" N, 89°54'58" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FAU 5257 over BRANCH
Structure number:790M0210001
Location:WARING RD - MEMPHIS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,270 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:90.2

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
March 201790.2Good7 out of 10-6270
April 201590.2Fair6 out of 10-6270
April 201390.2Fair6 out of 10-6270
May 201190.2Fair6 out of 10-6270
June 200990.2Fair6 out of 10-6270
November 200790.2Fair6 out of 10-6270
October 200588.9Good7 out of 10-7490
October 200388.5Good7 out of 10-7870
November 200188.5Good7 out of 10-7920
April 200089.3Good7 out of 10-7140
June 199889.9Good7 out of 10-6600
May 199888.4Good7 out of 10-7980
December 199590.4Good7 out of 10-6300
September 199391.1Good7 out of 10-5600
December 199196.9Good7 out of 10-100