Share:

FAS 176 over NONCONNAH CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.07694, -89.93111
35°04'37" N, 89°55'52" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAS 176 over NONCONNAH CREEK
Structure number:79E02010003
Location:0.2 MI. S OF I-240 JCT.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:51.2 ft. [15.6 m]
Total length:239.8 ft. [73.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:88.6 ft. [27.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:103.4 ft. [31.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1954
Year reconstructed:1984
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:35,870 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.7 tons [27.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:65.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$5,258,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
December 201665.9FairFairSatisfactoryFair-35870
June 201577.4FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-35870
May 201378.9FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-32180
July 201175.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD34120
July 200978.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-35230
July 200778.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-37520
July 200577.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-38270
July 200377.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-39770
August 200176.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-42480
September 199968.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-45780
March 199865.5FairFairSatisfactoryFair-43750
October 199565.5FairFairSatisfactoryFair-42260
September 199365.5FairFairSatisfactoryFair-38620
December 199149.5PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD43560

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.2,6402,640000
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.960960000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.24,240024,24000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Columneach6868000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.152152000
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.202202000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.445445000
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach3232000
Movable Bearingeach6666000
Fixed Bearingeach6666000
Bridge Rail
Other Material Bridge Raillinear ft.480480000