+35.06056, -89.93083
35°03'38" N, 89°55'51" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAS 176 over TEN MILE CREEK
Structure number:79S81110008
Location:0.3 MI N OF SR-4 JCT.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:102.0 ft. [31.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Skew angle:42°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:35,870 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:75.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$260,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201775.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO35870
March 201576.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO32180
March 201376.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO33540
April 201175.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO34120
May 200975.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO35230
September 200764.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO37520
September 200564.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO38270
October 200364.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO39770
October 200163.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO42480
March 200055.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO45780
March 199852.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO43750
October 199553.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO42260
September 199354.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO38620
December 199153.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO43560

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Closed Web/Box Girderlinear ft.101911000
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.3,8383,838000
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.3,8383,838000
Reinforced Concrete Columneach1615010
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.10096400
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.8080000
Bridge Rail
Other Material Bridge Raillinear ft.202198400