Share:

FAP 1 over CYPRESS CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.14939, -89.95975
35°08'58" N, 89°57'35" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAP 1 over CYPRESS CREEK
Structure number:79SR0010011
Location:1.2 MI E OF SR-57 JCT.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:24.3 ft. [7.4 m]
Total length:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:77.4 ft. [23.6 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:21,340 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:67.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$166,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
January 2017Fair5 out of 102134067.0
March 2015Fair5 out of 101962067.0
February 2013Fair5 out of 102012067.0
March 2011Fair5 out of 101972067.0
May 2009Fair5 out of 102030067.0
July 2007Fair5 out of 102015068.0
August 2005Fair5 out of 102085067.0
September 2003Fair5 out of 101069067.4
October 2001Fair5 out of 102440067.0
February 2000Fair5 out of 102489067.0
February 1998Fair5 out of 102772056.0
September 1995Fair5 out of 102536056.0
August 1993Fair5 out of 102198056.0
November 1991Fair5 out of 102435056.0

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Culvert
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.1641440200
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.1043450200