+35.04500, -90.02500
35°02'42" N, 90°01'30" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAU 3 over BRANCH
Structure number:79SR0030001
Location:1.5 M N OF SR175
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:11.5 ft. [3.5 m]
Total length:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1949
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:29,470 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.5 tons [25.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:61.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$583,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
January 201761.5Good7 out of 10-29470
March 201566.9Good7 out of 10-24840
February 201366.9Good7 out of 10-28100
April 201166.9Fair6 out of 10-30730
May 200966.9Fair6 out of 10-31240
August 200766.9Fair6 out of 10-34630
September 200566.9Fair6 out of 10-34500
September 200366.9Fair6 out of 10-38980
October 200166.9Fair6 out of 10-35970
February 200066.9Fair6 out of 10-35810
February 199866.9Fair6 out of 10-38880
September 199566.9Fair6 out of 10-38530
August 199366.9Fair6 out of 10-39670
December 199166.9Fair6 out of 10-37360

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.176176000