Share:

FAP 3 over OVERFLOW

Map

Coordinates:
+35.19511, -90.03486
35°11'42" N, 90°02'05" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAP 3 over OVERFLOW
Structure number:79SR0030027
Location:.19 FM RP TO SR300
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:276.3 ft. [84.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1934
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,160 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:47.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$6,668,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1216047.9
March 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1151047.9
March 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair991047.9
June 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1226047.9
June 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1058048.9
August 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1329048.9
September 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1308047.9
September 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1225047.9
October 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1210059.9
February 2000FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1265059.9
February 1998PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1104027.5
September 1995PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1113027.5
August 1993PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1220028.9
December 1991PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1180028.9