Share:

FAU 385 over NONCONNAH CR & QUINCE RD

Map

Coordinates:
+35.05228, -89.82350
35°03'08" N, 89°49'25" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAU 385 over NONCONNAH CR & QUINCE RD
Structure number:79SR3850015
Location:0.6 MI W OF SR177 JCT
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:139.1 ft. [42.4 m]
Total length:851.1 ft. [259.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:133.9 ft. [40.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:49°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:87,820 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:78.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$26,260,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2017FairSatisfactoryGoodGood8782078.2
May 2015FairSatisfactoryGoodGood8782077.2
May 2013FairSatisfactoryGoodGood8830077.2
June 2011FairSatisfactoryGoodFair7628066.2
July 2009FairSatisfactoryGoodFair7659066.2
July 2007FairGoodGoodFair7990066.2
July 2005FairGoodGoodFair8096066.2
July 2003FairGoodGoodFair6775066.2
August 2001GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good6306079.2
September 1999GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good5060079.2
March 1998GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good6122079.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.15,24615,246000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.114,345114,345000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Columneach6060000
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.412412000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.1,2361,236000
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach252252000
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.1,6941,694000