FAU 5696 over CUMBERLAND RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+36.24693, -85.9565536°14'49" N, 85°57'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | FAU 5696 over CUMBERLAND RIVER |
Structure number: | 800A3920001 |
Location: | IN THE CITY OF CARTHAGE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 316.0 ft. [96.3 m] |
Total length: | 1412.1 ft. [430.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.2 ft. [8.3 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 55.8 ft. [17.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1934 |
Year reconstructed: | 2014 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 5,980 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 43.4 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $14,057,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Poor | Good | Poor | Poor | 5980 | 43.4 |
June 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5950 | 69.0 |
August 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5180 | 69.6 |
July 2013 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Poor | 7600 | 4.0 |
July 2011 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Poor | 7600 | 4.0 |
January 2010 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Poor | 7600 | 4.0 |
December 2007 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Poor | 7600 | 4.0 |
July 2005 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 8130 | 25.9 |
July 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 8840 | 48.4 |
August 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 8840 | 49.7 |
September 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 8840 | 49.7 |
July 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 1000 | 55.8 |