NFA 1799 (SA 8115) over HAYES FORK CREEK


+36.59235, -87.85393
36°35'32" N, 87°51'14" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NFA 1799 (SA 8115) over HAYES FORK CREEK
Structure number:81S62650003
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1979
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:120 [as of 2019]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:93.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
April 2018Good7 out of 1012093.9
April 2016Good7 out of 1012093.9
April 2014Good7 out of 1012093.9
April 2012Fair6 out of 1012093.9
April 2010Fair6 out of 1012098.0
May 2008Fair6 out of 10120100.0
April 2006Fair6 out of 10120100.0
May 2004Fair6 out of 10130100.0
September 2002Fair6 out of 1013099.0
September 2000Fair6 out of 1014098.9
November 1998Fair6 out of 1011099.0
July 1996Fair6 out of 109098.0
August 1994Fair6 out of 1015097.9
July 1992Fair6 out of 1011098.0
August 1990Fair6 out of 1011098.0