Share: 
NFA 2140 (SA 8804) over LITTLE DOUBLE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.78778, -85.52320
35°47'16" N, 85°31'24" W
+35.78778, -85.52320
35°47'16" N, 85°31'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | NFA 2140 (SA 8804) over LITTLE DOUBLE CREEK |
| Structure number: | 88021400003 |
| Location: | SOUTH OF CANEY FORK RIVES |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1950 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 2019] |
| Truck traffic: | 17% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 95.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2018 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 70 | 95.9 |
| October 2016 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 70 | 95.9 |
| March 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 70 | 95.9 |
| March 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 70 | 99.9 |
| March 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 70 | 99.9 |
| February 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 70 | 99.9 |
| January 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 80 | 99.9 |
| November 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 150 | 97.8 |
| November 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 140 | 92.8 |
| October 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 92.8 |
| October 1998 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 120 | 94.8 |
| January 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 110 | 94.8 |
| August 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 140 | 94.8 |
| September 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 240 | 94.6 |
| September 1990 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 240 | 94.6 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1514429
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1514429