Share: 
NFA 2185 (SA 8801) over BEE FORK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.65515, -85.57213
35°39'19" N, 85°34'20" W
+35.65515, -85.57213
35°39'19" N, 85°34'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | NFA 2185 (SA 8801) over BEE FORK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 88021850011 |
| Location: | 6 MI S OF SR 30 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
| Total length: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.5 ft. [9.0 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1993 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 300 [as of 2019] |
| Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 87.3 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2018 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 87.3 |
| October 2016 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 86.3 |
| February 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 88.3 |
| February 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 88.3 |
| February 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 88.3 |
| February 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 89.3 |
| January 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 210 | 94.1 |
| November 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 210 | 94.1 |
| November 2002 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 340 | 89.3 |
| October 2000 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 370 | 89.2 |
| October 1998 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 320 | 89.3 |
| January 1997 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 300 | 88.8 |
| September 1994 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 300 | 87.8 |
| February 1993 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 300 | 87.8 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1514433
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1514433