NFA A015 over LAUREL CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.75083, -85.5646735°45'03" N, 85°33'53" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NFA A015 over LAUREL CREEK |
Structure number: | 880A0150001 |
Location: | 1MI FROM SR 30 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
Total length: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1921 |
Year reconstructed: | 1983 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 180 [as of 2019] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 180 | 85.3 |
October 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 180 | 85.3 |
February 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 180 | 86.3 |
February 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 180 | 86.3 |
February 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 180 | 86.3 |
February 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 180 | 86.3 |
January 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 180 | 87.3 |
November 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 180 | 87.3 |
November 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 180 | 87.3 |
October 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 180 | 87.3 |
October 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 180 | 89.3 |
January 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 89.4 |
August 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 89.4 |
September 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 60 | 77.4 |
September 1990 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 60 | 77.4 |