NFA 914 (SA 9110) over LITTLE BEECH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.43944, -87.8966735°26'22" N, 87°53'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NFA 914 (SA 9110) over LITTLE BEECH CREEK |
Structure number: | 91S62260005 |
Location: | 5.0 MI NE JCT SR128&SR228 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Total length: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.7 ft. [6.6 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1953 |
Year reconstructed: | 1992 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2015
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 190 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Operating rating: | 51.5 tons [46.8 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 30.7 tons [27.9 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 66.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $293,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
May 2015 | 66.3 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | - | 190 |
July 2013 | 66.3 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | - | 190 |
September 2011 | 66.3 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | - | 190 |
December 2009 | 69.4 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | - | 190 |
January 2008 | 81.4 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 190 |
February 2006 | 81.4 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 210 |
February 2004 | 79.4 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 200 |
March 2002 | 79.4 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 200 |
August 2000 | 81.4 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 160 |
September 1998 | 97.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 100 |
September 1996 | 96.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 100 |
October 1994 | 96.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 100 |
January 1993 | 96.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 100 |
June 1991 | 31.8 | Poor | Critical | Critical | Critical | SD | 100 |