Share:

FAS 84 over CHERRY CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.99333, -85.41889
35°59'36" N, 85°25'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:FAS 84 over CHERRY CREEK
Structure number:93SR0840003
Location:6 MI.EAST OF SR001
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Total length:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:710 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.1

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
January 201696.1Good7 out of 10-710
January 201496.3Good7 out of 10-670
January 201295.7Good7 out of 10-840
December 200995.9Good7 out of 10-780
December 200792.6Good7 out of 10-850
January 200692.5Good7 out of 10-870
January 200491.9Good7 out of 10-1040
January 200292.4Good7 out of 10-910
January 200092.4Fair6 out of 10-900
February 199892.9Fair6 out of 10-770
October 199592.9Fair6 out of 10-780
September 199392.7Fair6 out of 10-820
September 199192.8Fair6 out of 10-810