CR 15390 over Bee Bayou
Map
Coordinates:
+33.50662, -95.3767933°30'24" N, 95°22'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 15390 over Bee Bayou |
Structure number: | 011390AA0363001 |
Location: | 0.2 Mi W of SP 1501 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2011 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2010] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 30 | 99.0 |
December 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 30 | 99.0 |
January 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 30 | 99.0 |
January 2012 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 30 | 99.0 |
May 2010 | Poor | Good | Critical | Serious | 30 | 19.9 |
February 2008 | Poor | Good | Critical | Serious | 30 | 19.9 |
April 2006 | Poor | Good | Critical | Serious | 30 | 19.9 |
February 2004 | Poor | Very Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 30 | 19.9 |
March 2002 | Poor | Very Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 30 | 19.9 |
April 2001 | Poor | Very Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 30 | 21.9 |
April 2000 | Poor | Very Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 50 | 21.9 |
January 1998 | Poor | Very Good | Serious | Fair | 50 | 19.8 |
May 1996 | Poor | Very Good | Serious | Satisfactory | 50 | 19.8 |
July 1995 | Poor | Good | Serious | Satisfactory | 50 | 16.5 |
February 1994 | Poor | Good | Serious | Satisfactory | 50 | 16.5 |
March 1991 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Critical | 50 | 16.5 |