Share:

COCA COLA RNCH P-1 over West Fork Trinity River

Map

Coordinates:
+33.26811, -98.03091
33°16'05" N, 98°01'51" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:COCA COLA RNCH P-1 over West Fork Trinity River
Structure number:021200AA0130001
Location:4.6 MI S OF FM 1810
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:220.2 ft. [67.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:160 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:92.1

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
January 2017GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood16092.1
January 2015GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood16092.1
January 2013GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood16092.1
January 2011GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood16094.1
January 2009GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood16094.1
January 2007GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood16094.1
January 2005GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood7099.8
January 2003GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7099.8
January 2002GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent7099.8
January 2001PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor7013.8
January 1999PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor6014.4
March 1997PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor6014.4
January 1995FairSatisfactoryFairFair5020.5
March 1993FairSatisfactoryFairFair5027.4
February 1991FairSatisfactoryFairFair5030.6