US 287 NB over North Palo Duro Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+36.04369, -102.0017236°02'37" N, 102°00'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 287 NB over North Palo Duro Creek |
Structure number: | 041710006604002 |
Location: | 9.2 Mi N of FM 119 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 122.1 ft. [37.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1934 |
Year reconstructed: | 1953 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,200 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 28% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 80.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 3200 | 80.6 |
September 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 3200 | 83.8 |
September 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 3200 | 81.8 |
September 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2300 | 77.1 |
March 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2100 | 77.2 |
March 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2250 | 88.4 |
March 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2300 | 88.4 |
March 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1600 | 87.6 |
March 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2800 | 88.0 |
October 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 2800 | 86.0 |
April 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2000 | 75.2 |
May 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2000 | 75.2 |
May 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2100 | 75.1 |
May 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 2100 | 86.2 |
June 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2100 | 86.2 |
May 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1800 | 66.9 |
June 1992 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 770 | 76.3 |
April 1990 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1950 | 77.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 976 | 752 | 186 | 38 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 4,880 | 3,965 | 887 | 28 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 12 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 80 | 59 | 16 | 5 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 120 | 60 | 46 | 14 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 244 | 171 | 70 | 3 | 0 |