US 385 over Drain


+35.21183, -102.41651
35°12'43" N, 102°24'59" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:US 385 over Drain
Structure number:041800022603009
Location:1.8 Mi S of IH 40
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:5.9 ft. [1.8 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:58.1 ft. [17.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1947
Year reconstructed:1970
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,610 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:52% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:92.5

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
September 2017Good7 out of 10261092.5
September 2015Good7 out of 10261099.8
September 2013Good7 out of 10240096.8
February 2012Good7 out of 10210096.8
March 2010Good7 out of 10210099.8
March 2008Good7 out of 10210099.8
March 2006Good7 out of 10175097.8
March 2004Good7 out of 10175094.8
May 2002Fair6 out of 10240086.6
August 2000Fair6 out of 10220086.6
September 1998Fair6 out of 10220086.6
July 1996Good7 out of 10180086.7
May 1994Good7 out of 10220086.7
May 1992Good7 out of 10155094.0
March 1990Good7 out of 10125094.0