CR 72 over QUITAQUE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+34.24411, -101.3377534°14'39" N, 101°20'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 72 over QUITAQUE CREEK |
Structure number: | 050780AA0188001 |
Location: | 1.50 MI W OF SH 207 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.7 ft. [6.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.7 ft. [6.3 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 60 [as of 2013] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 70.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 70.4 |
August 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 70.2 |
September 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 70.2 |
September 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 70.2 |
September 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 70.4 |
September 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 70.4 |
February 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 60 | 76.3 |
February 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 60 | 72.2 |
January 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 60 | 72.2 |
January 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 60 | 72.2 |
October 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 60 | 70.5 |
September 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 69.0 |
May 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 60 | 69.0 |