US 59 over Lagarto Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+28.08788, -98.3361528°05'16" N, 98°20'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 59 over Lagarto Creek |
Structure number: | 151620054205043 |
Location: | 1.35 Mi SW of FM 624 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 109.9 ft. [33.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 43.6 ft. [13.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 45.9 ft. [14.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1951 |
Year reconstructed: | 1989 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,280 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 33% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.1 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2280 | 78.1 |
July 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2280 | 77.7 |
January 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2200 | 79.0 |
January 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2200 | 79.0 |
January 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1900 | 92.8 |
March 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2100 | 92.2 |
February 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2900 | 88.1 |
January 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2700 | 88.4 |
February 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2500 | 89.0 |
February 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2300 | 89.5 |
December 1998 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 2200 | 89.8 |
June 1996 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1900 | 90.6 |
April 1994 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Good | 1800 | 90.8 |
September 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1750 | 90.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 82 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 135 | 126 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 260 | 260 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 5,060 | 5,060 | 0 | 0 | 0 |