US 271 over BIG SLOUGH
Map
Coordinates:
+33.32853, -95.0947133°19'43" N, 95°05'41" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 271 over BIG SLOUGH |
Structure number: | 192250022105033 |
Location: | 2.40 MI S OF FM 71 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 180.1 ft. [54.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1938 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 9 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 5,050 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 22% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 47.8 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Estimated cost of work: | $11,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 5050 | 47.8 |
June 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 5050 | 47.5 |
June 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5100 | 56.4 |
June 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5100 | 56.4 |
June 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4800 | 57.7 |
July 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5200 | 57.7 |
July 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5000 | 57.7 |
July 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5300 | 57.4 |
July 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4900 | 58.4 |
September 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4900 | 57.4 |
June 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4300 | 56.4 |
June 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4300 | 48.4 |
October 1994 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 3500 | 49.4 |
April 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 3500 | 49.5 |
April 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4000 | 49.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 62 | 58 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 216 | 207 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 360 | 360 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 4,680 | 4,574 | 90 | 16 | 0 |