Share:

SH 285 over DRAW

Map

Coordinates:
+27.23786, -98.02333
27°14'16" N, 98°01'24" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SH 285 over DRAW
Structure number:210240010207099
Location:2.20 MI E OF FM 2191
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:6.9 ft. [2.1 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:46.3 ft. [14.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1989
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,700 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:84.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2017Good7 out of 10670084.0
February 2013Good7 out of 10600084.9
May 2009Good7 out of 10620084.4
May 2005Good7 out of 10470087.9
June 2001Good7 out of 10470088.9
August 1997Good7 out of 10530087.5
August 1995Good7 out of 10280093.4
March 1993Good7 out of 10340092.0
January 1991Good8 out of 10240099.1