RM 693 over ELM CREEK


+29.26253, -100.51927
29°15'45" N, 100°31'09" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RM 693 over ELM CREEK
Structure number:221360087601001
Location:6.20 MI SW OF US 90
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:6.9 ft. [2.1 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.2 ft. [8.3 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1953
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:210 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:12% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:78.6

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
September 2018Fair6 out of 1021078.6
September 2016Fair6 out of 1021078.3
September 2014Fair6 out of 1015079.4
September 2012Good7 out of 1015079.4
October 2010Good7 out of 1014079.8
October 2008Fair6 out of 1024079.2
November 2006Fair6 out of 1012092.0
December 2004Fair6 out of 1012092.0
February 2001Fair6 out of 1016091.0
January 1999Good7 out of 1013098.0
October 1996Good7 out of 1010096.0
August 1994Good7 out of 1012096.0
April 1990Good8 out of 1015095.1