2500 SOUTH ST.-CO. over STEINAKER CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+40.41903, -109.5406140°25'09" N, 109°32'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 2500 SOUTH ST.-CO. over STEINAKER CANAL |
Structure number: | 047022D |
Location: | 680 WEST 2500 SOUTH ST. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Total length: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Skew angle: | 5° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1995 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 315 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 315 | 82.4 |
April 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 315 | 82.4 |
April 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 315 | 82.4 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 315 | 97.0 |
March 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 315 | 97.0 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 315 | 97.0 |
July 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 250 | 97.0 |
August 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 250 | 97.0 |
May 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 250 | 97.0 |
April 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 250 | 92.0 |
April 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 250 | 92.0 |
May 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 250 | 92.0 |
October 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 250 | 97.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 70 | 58 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 58 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,015 | 815 | 200 | 0 | 0 |