SR-16 over WOODRUFF-RANDOLPH CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+41.61575, -111.1791841°36'57" N, 111°10'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR-16 over WOODRUFF-RANDOLPH CANAL |
Structure number: | 0D 382 |
Location: | 3 MILES SOUTH OF RANDOLPH |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Total length: | 56.8 ft. [17.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.3 ft. [12.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1934 |
Year reconstructed: | 1985 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,395 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 24% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 73.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1395 | 73.2 |
August 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | - | Satisfactory | 1395 | 47.4 |
August 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1365 | 37.4 |
September 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1346 | 73.7 |
June 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2440 | 72.5 |
May 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2440 | 72.5 |
November 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1900 | 72.5 |
November 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1900 | 72.5 |
June 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1700 | 72.5 |
August 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1700 | 72.1 |
May 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1655 | 67.5 |
May 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1400 | 67.5 |
July 1995 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1110 | 78.5 |
September 1993 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1055 | 78.9 |
September 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 845 | 80.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 43 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 114 | 84 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,406 | 2,335 | 5 | 66 | 0 |