US-40 (SR-40) over STEINAKER CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+40.44337, -109.5598740°26'36" N, 109°33'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US-40 (SR-40) over STEINAKER CANAL |
Structure number: | 0D 828 |
Location: | WEST SIDE OF VERNAL |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Total length: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 96.8 ft. [29.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Year reconstructed: | 1985 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 22,360 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 39% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 22360 | 78.5 |
July 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 22360 | 78.5 |
July 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10002 | 86.4 |
July 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 22235 | 85.6 |
July 2009 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 22235 | 85.6 |
July 2007 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 26185 | 84.4 |
August 2005 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 26185 | 84.4 |
July 2003 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 25723 | 84.6 |
June 1999 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 24585 | 79.4 |
June 1997 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 23180 | 79.9 |
June 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 21675 | 85.4 |
August 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 21675 | 85.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 200 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 4,172 | 4,172 | 0 | 0 | 0 |