STONEY POINT ROAD over APPOMATTOX RIVER
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+37.42769, -78.1973837°25'40" N, 78°11'51" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | STONEY POINT ROAD over APPOMATTOX RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000001254 |
Location: | Amelia/Cumberland Co Line |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 95.1 ft. [29.0 m] |
Total length: | 95.1 ft. [29.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 12.5 ft. [3.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1912 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2014
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 88 [as of 2006] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 9.4 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,500,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 88 | 9.4 |
October 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 88 | 9.4 |
October 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 88 | 9.4 |
October 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 88 | 9.4 |
October 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 88 | 9.4 |
October 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 88 | 9.4 |
January 2009 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 88 | 9.4 |
October 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 88 | 0.0 |
October 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 86 | 19.9 |
October 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 86 | 19.9 |
October 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 86 | 12.6 |
October 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 68 | 13.4 |
October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 68 | 15.6 |
October 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 68 | 15.6 |
October 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 73 | 13.2 |
January 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 73 | 15.5 |
October 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 73 | 15.5 |
October 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 176 | 12.5 |
October 1996 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 56 | 16.0 |
October 1995 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 56 | 16.0 |
October 1994 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 56 | 16.0 |
October 1993 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 67 | 15.7 |
October 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 86 | 17.9 |
October 1991 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Very Good | 53 | 18.5 |