Meadow Hollow Road over Horsley Creek

Map

Coordinates:
+37.59264, -79.23450
37°35'34" N, 79°14'04" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	Meadow Hollow Road over Horsley Creek
Structure number:	000000000001480
Location:	1.00-Dead End/0.80-Rt 799
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	30.8 ft. `[9.4 m]`
Total length:	60.0 ft. `[18.3 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	11.8 ft. `[3.6 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	14.1 ft. `[4.3 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1935
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	37 `[as of 2014]`
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. `[5]`
Pier/abutment protection:	In place but in a deteriorated condition `[3]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. `[4]`
Sufficiency rating:	49.1
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$671,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
April 2017	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	37	49.1
April 2015	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	37	49.1
April 2013	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	39	56.2
April 2011	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	39	48.1
April 2010	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	39	48.1
April 2009	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	39	48.1
April 2008	Poor	Good	Satisfactory	Poor	39	48.1
April 2007	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	38	48.1
April 2006	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	38	48.1
June 2005	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	38	48.1
May 2004	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	43	48.0
July 2003	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	43	48.0
May 2002	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	43	48.0
May 2001	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	173	65.8
July 2000	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	173	65.8
May 1999	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	173	65.8
May 1998	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	169	65.8
June 1997	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	189	65.5
August 1996	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	169	65.8
May 1995	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Poor	169	4.0
June 1994	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	102	4.0
May 1993	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	102	4.0
December 1991	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	91	2.0