Cedar Gate Road over Muddy Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+37.52152, -79.1598137°31'17" N, 79°09'35" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Cedar Gate Road over Muddy Creek |
Structure number: | 000000000001496 |
Location: | .70-Rt.657/.40-Rt.675 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Total length: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1980 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 706 [as of 2014] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 71.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 706 | 71.6 |
March 2016 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 706 | 87.7 |
March 2014 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 642 | 85.7 |
March 2012 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 642 | 85.7 |
March 2010 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 642 | 85.7 |
February 2008 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 767 | 88.7 |
February 2006 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 735 | 88.1 |
March 2004 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 667 | 87.1 |
February 2003 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 520 | 71.1 |
February 2002 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 520 | 71.1 |
January 2001 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 481 | 71.2 |
January 2000 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 481 | 72.0 |
February 1999 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 468 | 72.0 |
January 1998 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 468 | 72.0 |
March 1997 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 468 | 72.0 |
March 1995 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 468 | 88.0 |
April 1993 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 468 | 88.0 |
March 1991 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 229 | 73.0 |