Copper Mine Rd over Joshua Creek


+37.60929, -78.46114
37°36'33" N, 78°27'40" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Copper Mine Rd over Joshua Creek
Structure number:000000000004059
Location:0.60-Rt.682 / 2.00-Rt.676
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:29.2 ft. [8.9 m]
Total length:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:113 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:76.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$203,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2018GoodGoodGoodGood11376.9
June 2016GoodGoodGoodGood11376.9
June 2014GoodGoodGoodGood12076.9
June 2012GoodGoodGoodGood12176.9
June 2010GoodGoodGoodGood12169.4
June 2009GoodGoodGoodGood12169.4
June 2008GoodGoodGoodGood12172.4
June 2007GoodGoodGoodGood12172.4
July 2006GoodGoodGoodGood10271.4
September 2005GoodGoodGoodGood10271.4
June 2004GoodGoodGoodVery Good10271.4
June 2002GoodGoodGoodVery Good11260.1
July 2000GoodGoodGoodVery Good10958.2
June 1998GoodGoodGoodVery Good10958.2
June 1996GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good8870.2
March 1995GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good8870.2
March 1994GoodGoodVery GoodGood8870.2
May 1993GoodGoodVery GoodGood7070.2
March 1992GoodGoodVery GoodGood7675.6