Jeb Stuart hwy. over Bluestone Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+36.81097, -78.5770136°48'40" N, 78°34'37" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Jeb Stuart hwy. over Bluestone Creek |
Structure number: | 000000000004850 |
Location: | .72 to Meck CL-1.26 to 15 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 36.4 ft. [11.1 m] |
Total length: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1931 |
Year reconstructed: | 2007 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,211 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 64.1 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $782,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 2211 | 64.1 |
November 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2211 | 62.4 |
November 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2301 | 69.6 |
November 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2301 | 70.9 |
November 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 2301 | 73.1 |
November 2007 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Good | 2251 | 73.1 |
November 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 2400 | 58.9 |
November 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 2329 | 59.0 |
December 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 2213 | 61.0 |
February 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2481 | 74.9 |
December 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2481 | 74.9 |
December 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 2200 | 74.9 |
December 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 2000 | 74.9 |
September 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 1875 | 75.9 |
October 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 1890 | 75.9 |