Game Farm Road over Reynolds Creek


+37.60948, -78.21169
37°36'34" N, 78°12'42" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Game Farm Road over Reynolds Creek
Structure number:000000000005735
Location:0.30 to 608 - 1.50 to 663
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Total length:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1962
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:53 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:68.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$335,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2018FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair5368.7
August 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair5368.7
August 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair5368.7
August 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair5368.7
August 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair4873.1
August 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair4873.1
August 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair4873.1
January 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair4876.7
January 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair4876.7
January 2010FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair4876.7
January 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3576.7
January 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3579.7
January 2007FairGoodSatisfactoryFair3579.7
May 2005FairGoodSatisfactoryFair4479.7
May 2004FairGoodSatisfactoryFair4479.7
June 2003FairGoodSatisfactoryFair4479.7
May 2002FairGoodSatisfactoryFair8274.6
June 2001FairGoodSatisfactoryFair8272.6
May 2000FairGoodGoodFair8072.6
May 1999FairGoodGoodFair8067.6
May 1998FairGoodGoodSatisfactory8078.6
June 1997GoodGoodGoodGood8078.6
September 1996GoodGoodGoodGood5078.6
June 1995GoodGoodGoodGood5078.7
June 1994GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood5078.7
July 1993GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood5278.6
May 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood4973.7
July 1991GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood4973.7